🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.